Metastatic
spinal tumor has been reported to occur in approximately 30% of cancer
patients. The distribution of lesions is 10% in cervical spine, 20% in lumbar spine
and 70% in thoracic spine. Five percent of metastatic spinal tumor is reportedto cause epidural compression, giving rise to clinical symptoms such asparalysis and pain. These symptoms can lead to deterioration of patients’ daily
activities. The therapeutic choice for these patients should be based on
clinical information such as the extent of metastasis, degree of malignancy,
general condition of the patient, and estimated life expectancy.
Tokuhashi
et al. reported a scoring system for pre-operative evaluation of prognosis of
metastatic spine tumor. In their paper, prognosis evaluation was based on the
opinion of oncologist and the pre-operative prognostic score. They suggested
that excisional procedures are indicated in patients with a total score from
their scoring system of 12 or more (predicted survival period, 1 year or
longer), while conservative or palliative procedures are indicated on patients
with a total score of 8 or less (predicted survival period, less than 6 months).
Tomita et al. also described a scoring system, with corresponding treatment
proposals, for patients with spinal metastasis. It was based on three prognostic
factors: (1) grade of malignancy, (2) presence of visceral metastasis, and (3)
presence of bone metastases. Their strategy for each patient was decided along
with treatment goal: a wide or marginal excision for long-term local control,
marginal or intralesional excision for medium-term local control, palliative
surgery for short-term palliation, and non-operative supportive care.(Read More)
No comments:
Post a Comment